Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru
 
 

Go Back   Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru > The Inner Circle > The Riverside Inn

Notices

Poll: Should ANet temp ban spammers in all chat?
Poll Options
Should ANet temp ban spammers in all chat?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old May 24, 2007, 04:59 PM // 16:59   #21
Furnace Stoker
 
Sir Skullcrasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: California
Guild: 15 over 50 [Rare]
Profession: W/Mo
Advertisement

Disable Ads
Default

YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES

*ban sir skull for spamming* lol

I approve of this action since spammers are getting on my nerves!
Sir Skullcrasher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24, 2007, 05:09 PM // 17:09   #22
Site Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Profession: R/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryant Again
If that's the case then this poll will need to be more specific, Ryker. Example: I am in support of a temp ban of an hour. I am not in support of a temp ban of 72.
That is not what I was looking for. I just wanted to know if people were in favor of it, yes or no. How long isn't up to us, it's up to ANet.
Commander Ryker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24, 2007, 05:13 PM // 17:13   #23
Site Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Default

No.

Perma ban.
__________________
Old Skool '05
Malice Black is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24, 2007, 05:23 PM // 17:23   #24
Wilds Pathfinder
 
TwinRaven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Profession: W/
Default

Local chat is for spamming LFG
Trade chat is for spamming WTB WTS
don't like spam? pick another district
need to spam to sell stuff? use the auction house...uh....whoops! nvm
TwinRaven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24, 2007, 05:30 PM // 17:30   #25
Krytan Explorer
 
aaje vhanli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Default

Yes .
aaje vhanli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24, 2007, 05:31 PM // 17:31   #26
Hall Hero
 
Bryant Again's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Commander Ryker
That is not what I was looking for. I just wanted to know if people were in favor of it, yes or no. How long isn't up to us, it's up to ANet.
If that's the case, then I see no reason not to ban them. They broke the rules, they should receive punishment. Simple as that.

Last edited by Bryant Again; May 24, 2007 at 05:38 PM // 17:38..
Bryant Again is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24, 2007, 05:37 PM // 17:37   #27
Ascalonian Squire
 
Heavy Chaos Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Edge of Existance
Guild: Legion of the Black Phoenix
Default

Yes temp ban them, hate trade spammers in normal chat
Heavy Chaos Master is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24, 2007, 05:41 PM // 17:41   #28
Krytan Explorer
 
aaje vhanli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryant Again
If that's the case, then I see no reason not to ban them. They broke the rules, they should receive punishment. Simple as that.
Exactly .
aaje vhanli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24, 2007, 05:57 PM // 17:57   #29
Lion's Arch Merchant
 
gene terrodon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Maryland/DC Area
Guild: Farmers Unite [FU]
Profession: W/
Default

I agree with Aera Lure...
The obvious abuse of the chat system should be one of the reasons as well as context.
I would like to see Anet expand the suppression they use now.
First time....30 secs
Second Time...2 min 30 secs
Third Time...12 min 30secs
Fourth Time...62 min 30 secs
Fifth Time...5hrs 12 min 30 secs
Anytime after 5...24 hrs

With the stipulation that the ban is for all chat except Guild and Team
gene terrodon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24, 2007, 06:34 PM // 18:34   #30
Lion's Arch Merchant
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Oregon
Guild: DOH
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rohara
no...banning people for spamming is just a lazy way of dealing with the trade problem

if they keep doing this, i expect them to start banning leechers as well. they're much more hurtful to others' gameplay then spammers. spammers can be shut out by turning off the trade channels.
Trade Spam is NOT the only spam so the "lazy" argument doesn't apply
Tempy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24, 2007, 07:02 PM // 19:02   #31
Desert Nomad
 
isamu kurosawa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Profession: Me/
Default

I say spammers should get a mute (cant use local or trade chat) for at least 30 mins and those trading in local should recieve a 72 hour ban, with repeat offenders getting longer and tougher punnishments.

Or for first time offenders, give them a warning in the form of a system message. If they give the excuse they didn't see it because trade spam forced it off screen to fast then they can't deny what they are doing is causing a problem.

Last edited by isamu kurosawa; May 24, 2007 at 07:05 PM // 19:05..
isamu kurosawa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24, 2007, 07:05 PM // 19:05   #32
Furnace Stoker
 
Sir Skullcrasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: California
Guild: 15 over 50 [Rare]
Profession: W/Mo
Default

Screw it, jail sentence and life time ban from ever using a computer!!
Sir Skullcrasher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24, 2007, 08:43 PM // 20:43   #33
Krytan Explorer
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Guild: Aatxe Pirates [YaRR]
Profession: A/
Default

No ban, but a mute, for like a day or two. Ban is overkill.
Swift Thief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24, 2007, 09:17 PM // 21:17   #34
Academy Page
 
Alvarez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Default

If it's a temp. ban for a few hours, absolutely.
Alvarez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24, 2007, 09:40 PM // 21:40   #35
Forge Runner
 
sixdartbart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Guild: Peace Machine GRRR [DiE]
Profession: W/N
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Commander Ryker
[FONT="Comic Sans MS"]Just as the title says. All it takes is a simple yes or no.
But it's not a simple yes or no.
Yes if it is you and no if it is me.

On second thought I would never do such a thing so just Yes...
sixdartbart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24, 2007, 09:43 PM // 21:43   #36
Technician's Corner Moderator
 
Tarun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The TARDIS
Guild: http://www.lunarsoft.net/ http://forums.lunarsoft.net/
Default

No. It won't solve anything; just make things worse and piss off more and more of the community.
Tarun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24, 2007, 09:45 PM // 21:45   #37
Lion's Arch Merchant
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Profession: R/Me
Default

No other way of selling besides fansite auction/forums?

If there was an Auctionhouse or other means to sell maybe. but temp banning over selling an item is retarded.

Last edited by Replicant; May 24, 2007 at 09:51 PM // 21:51..
Replicant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24, 2007, 09:59 PM // 21:59   #38
Desert Nomad
 
Aera Lure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: In Baltar's head
Guild: Bring Out Your Dead [BOYD], former officer [LBS]
Profession: Mo/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Replicant
No other way of selling besides fansite auction/forums?

If there was an Auctionhouse or other means to sell maybe. but temp banning over selling an item is retarded.
Remember though, its not temp banning over selling an item... Its temp banning over abusive, repetitive spamming of sales related activities on the All channel. Think most of us frown on sales on the All channel, but we arent even talking about that. Not only is it on the wrong channel, its multiple line repitition in quantity is what we're looking at. Fundamentally nothing at all to do with or without an Auction House.
Aera Lure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24, 2007, 10:19 PM // 22:19   #39
Forge Runner
 
Kool Pajamas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Maryland
Guild: Mage Elites [MAGE]
Default

/signed


This thread is for the ALL channel not any other channel. Spamming in trade channel while still being a bit rude isnt anywhere near the same as the all channel.
Kool Pajamas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24, 2007, 10:23 PM // 22:23   #40
Krytan Explorer
 
aaje vhanli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tarun
No. It won't solve anything; just make things worse and piss off more and more of the community.
"Worse" from the perspective of trade-spammers who insist on abusing the chat rules and are completely unwilling to utilize the options that aNet has provided its players (regardless of how flawed they may be).

Last edited by aaje vhanli; May 24, 2007 at 10:27 PM // 22:27..
aaje vhanli is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share This Forum!  
 
 
           

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:06 PM // 12:06.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
jQuery(document).ready(checkAds()); function checkAds(){if (document.getElementById('adsense')!=undefined){document.write("_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Adblock', 'Unblocked', 'false',,true]);");}else{document.write("